Does plain radiography predict pneumothorax size?
Date First Published:
November 28, 2005
Last Updated:
May 8, 2006
Report by:
Gary Sudwarts, Senior House Officer (Great Ormond Street Hospital)
Search checked by:
David Foley, Great Ormond Street Hospital
Three-Part Question:
In [a patient with a pneumothorax] are [plain chest x-rays] reliable [in predicting volume of air in the chest]
Clinical Scenario:
A 22 year old male presents to you in Accident and Emergency complaining of sudden onset of shortness of breath and right sided pleuritic chest pain. He has clinical signs in keeping with a pneumothorax and is not currently tensioning. You request a plain PA erect chest radiograph which shows a small right tided pneumothorax. After aspirating 200ml of air, you repeat the chest radiograph which shows no improvement in the pneumothorax. Can you rely on the x-ray ?
Search Strategy:
Medline 1966 to 05/2006 using the OVID interface
Search Details:
("pneumothorax"[MeSH Terms] OR pneumothorax[Text Word]) AND size[All Fields] Cochrane 11/07: "pneumothorax size"
Outcome:
Altogether 400 papers were found using MEDLINE, of which 4 were deemed to be relevant or of sufficient quality for inclusion. Guidelines published by the British Thoracic Society on the management of spontaneous pneumothorax in 2003 has a section relevant to this question.
Relevant Paper(s):
| Study Title | Patient Group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quantification of pneumothorax size on chest radiographs using interpleural distances: regression analysis based on volume measurements from helical CT. Collins CD, Lopez A, Mathie A, Wood V, Jackson JE, Roddie ME. 1995 Nov UK | 19 adults. 20 pneumothoraces. Spontaneous (7), iatrogenic (13) | prospective controlled cohort study | formula to accurately calculate percentage pneumothorax from a plain chest radiograph | r =0.98 (p < 0.0001) | No trauma patients included. Small cohort. Formula not validated in a prospective clinical trail. |
| Chest radiograph--a poor method for determining the size of a pneumothorax. Engdahl O, Toft T, Boe J. 1993 Jan Sweden | 16 consecutive adults with spontaneous pneumothorax | prospective case controlled cohort | correlation between plain chest radiography and CT scans in determining size of pneumothorax | r = 0.71 (0.001<p<0.01) | small cohort. Only included spontaneous pneumothoraces - no other aetiology. |
| The management of chest tubes in patients with a pneumothorax and an air leak after pulmonary resection. Blaivas M, Lyon M, Duggal S. 2005 Sep USA | 176 adults who presented with blunt trauma. They all had a focussed assessment with sonography (FAST) ultrasound scan and were sufficiently ill to justify a CT scan of their chest. 53 had pneumothoraces either on CT scan; or post thoracostomy (if the clinician reported hearing a rush of air after placing a chest tube). | Prospective single blinded study with convenience sampling | to compare the sensitivity and specificity of supine chest x-rays in the detection of pneumothorax using CT as the gold standard | Chest radiography sensitivity 75.5% (95% CI 61.7% to 86.2%) specificity 100% (95% CI 97.1% to 100%). Ultasound sensitivity 98.1% (95% CI 89.9% to 99.9%) specificity 99.2% (95% CI 95.6% to 99.9%) | only severely injured trauma patients, pneumothorax could have increased in size between investigations |
| Comparison between two methods for estimating pneumothorax size from chest X-rays. Kelly AM, Weldon D, Tsang AY, Graham CA. 2006 Jan 4; Australia | 57 adult patients with spontaneous pneumothorax | retrospective cohort review | comparing two common methods to estimate the size of pneumothoraces on plain chest radiographs | they agree on smaller pneumothoraces but the Rhea method may significantly under-estimate the size of larger pneumothoraces. | small retrospective study. Did not compare either method to the accepted standard of a CT scan |
Author Commentary:
Although there are no large high quality trails considering this question, there seems to be no debate that a plain film erect or supine chest radiograph usually underestimates the size of a pneumothorax and is certainly unreliable. There are formulas using interpleural distances that do enhance reliability. Computed tomography (CT) scanning is considered the best investigation although very specialised investigations, such as plethysmography, are available. The lateral decubitous radiograph is probably as sensitive as CT scanning. It recognised that widespread use of CT scans for suspected pneumothorax is impractical however it is indicated if clinical suspicion is high or in the case of difficult to read x-rays such as in patients with emphysematous bullous disease. The British Thoracic Society has published guidelines on the management of spontaneous pneumothorax in 2003.
Bottom Line:
Erect or supine chest x-rays are not reliable in estimating the size of a pneumothorax.
References:
- Collins CD, Lopez A, Mathie A, Wood V, Jackson JE, Roddie ME.. Quantification of pneumothorax size on chest radiographs using interpleural distances: regression analysis based on volume measurements from helical CT.
- Engdahl O, Toft T, Boe J.. Chest radiograph--a poor method for determining the size of a pneumothorax.
- Blaivas M, Lyon M, Duggal S.. The management of chest tubes in patients with a pneumothorax and an air leak after pulmonary resection.
- Kelly AM, Weldon D, Tsang AY, Graham CA.. Comparison between two methods for estimating pneumothorax size from chest X-rays.