Accuracy of CT pulmonary angiogram in the diagnosis of of pulmonary embolism.

Date First Published:
January 28, 2003
Last Updated:
June 27, 2003
Report by:
Dr Kerstin Hogg, Clinical Research Fellow (Manchester Royal Infirmary)
Search checked by:
Ged Brown, Manchester Royal Infirmary
Three-Part Question:
In [a patient with symptoms and signs of pulmonary embolism] what is the [diagnostic utility] of a [CT pulmonary angiography]?
Clinical Scenario:
You have reviewed a 48 year old man who presents with isolated pleuritic chest pain on the left side. His fingers are nicotine stained. He tells you he regularly coughs up yellow phlegm in the morning. His PaO2, PaCO2 are normal and D-dimers elevated. You would like to discharge him to the care of his GP if you are able to rule out pulmonary embolus. Would a CT pulmonary angiogram allow you to do this?
Search Strategy:
Medline 1966-05/03 using the OVID interface.
Search Details:
[Exp Tomography, X-ray Computed, OR CT.mp OR Computed tomograph$.mp] AND [exp pulmonary embolism OR pulmonary embol$.mp. OR PE.mp. OR exp thromboembolism OR pulmonary infarct$.mp] LIMIT to human AND English.
Outcome:
2291 papers were found. 47 addressed the question. Six were excluded on the grounds of weak reference standard. Four were excluded because they used highly selected patient populations, not representative of patients in the emergency department. One study looked specifically at chronic PE. Six studies used a retrospective methodology. One study used a theoretical approach. All meta-analysis were excluded.
Relevant Paper(s):
Study Title Patient Group Study type (level of evidence) Outcomes Key results Study Weaknesses
Central pulmonary thromboembolism: diagnosis with spiral volumetric CT with the single-breath-hold technique--comparison with pulmonary angiography. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Wattinne L, et al. 1992, France 32 patients ?PE and 10 patients with unexplained chest X-ray findings Diagnostic study Sensitivity 100% 54.7% prevalence of PE
10 patients not referred on a ?PE basis
Specificity 95.80%
Detection of pulmonary embolism in patients with unresolved clinical and scintigraphic diagnosis: helical CT versus angiography. Goodman LR, Curtin JJ, Mewissen MW, et al. 1995, USA 20 ?PE patients with nondiagnostic VQ scan results AND normal Doppler leg scans Diagnostic study Sensitivity 63.60% 55% prevalence PE suggests high risk population
Specificity 88.80%
Pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced electron-beam CT and comparison with pulmonary angiography Teigen CL, Maus TP, Sheedy PF, et al. 1995, USA 60 patients referred for pulmonary angiography Diagnostic study Sensitivity 81.80% Patients referred for pulmonary angiography only
Specificity 93.70%
Pulmonary embolism: validation of spiral CT angiography in 149 patients. van Rossum AB, Pattynama PM, Ton ER, et al. 1996, Holland 149 patients with nondiagnostic VQ scan results Diagnostic study Observer 1<br>Sensitivity<br>Specificity <br><br>94%<br>96% 45.6% prevalence PE
CTPA results used in diagnostic protocol
Observer 2<br>Sensitivity<br>Specificity <br><br>82%<br>93%
Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with spiral CT: comparison with pulmonary angiography and scintigraphy. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Deschildre F, et al. 1996, France 65 patients referred for pulmonary angiography Diagnostic study Sensitivity 97.50% 61.5% prevalence PE reflects the high risk population referred for pulmonary angiography
Specificity 100%
Prospective comparison of helical CT and MR imaging in clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Sostman HD, Layish DT, Tapson VF, et al. 1996, USA 28 ?PE patients Diagnostic study Average of experienced radiologists Sensitivity 71% 257 patients excluded
Average of experienced radiologists Specificity 93.50%
Acute pulmonary embolism: role of helical CT in 164 patients with intermediate probability at ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy and normal results at duplex US of the legs. Ferretti GR, Bosson JL, Buffaz PD, et al. 1997, France 113 patients with nondiagnostic VQ scans and normal Doppler leg scans and negative CTPAs Management study % diagnosed with DVT or PE in follow up period (minimum 3 months) 7% Excluded all patients with positive Doppler scans
Utilization of electron beam CT scan in diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Boonbaichaiyapruck S, Panpunnang S, Siripornpitak S 1997, Thailand 20 patients ?PE presenting to one hospital over a year Diagnostic study Sensitivity 92.30% Unusually high prevalence PE – 60%
Specificity 100%
Pulmonary embolism: prospective comparison of spiral CT with ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. Mayo JR, Remy-Jardin M, Muller NL, et al. 1997, Canada & France 135 patients referred for diagnostic imaging ?PE in two centres (different countries) Diagnostic study Sensitivity 88.90% Only 16% patients were outpatients
CTPA results used in the diagnostic protocol
Specificity 97.80%
Acute pulmonary embolism: assessment of helical CT for diagnosis. Drucker EA, Rivitz SM, Shepard JA et al. 1998, USA 47 patients referred for pulmonary angiography Diagnostic study Sensitivity Inexperienced reader 60%<br>Experienced 81% 111 excluded
Looked only at patients referred for pulmonary angiography – selective population
Specificity Inexperienced reader 53%<br>Experienced 97%
Pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with spiral CT and ventilation-perfusion scanning--correlation with pulmonary angiographic results or clinical outcome. Garg K, Welsh CH, Feyerabend AJ, et al. 1998, USA 24 patients with nondiagnostic VQ scans Diagnostic study Sensitivity 66.60% Small cohort
Specificity 100%
Clinically suspected pulmonary embolism: utility of spiral CT. Kim KI, Muller NL, Mayo JR. 1999, Canada 103 patients referred for CTPA Diagnostic study Sensitivity 92% Only 28% were outpatients
CTPA results used in the diagnostic protocol
Specificity 96.20%
Pulmonary embolism revealed on helical CT angiography: comparison with ventilation-perfusion radionuclide lung scanning. Blachere H, Latrabe V, Montaudon M, et al. 2000, France 174 ?PE patients Diagnostic study Sensitivity 92.70% Only 15% outpatients
CTPA used in the diagnostic protocol
Specificity 97.10%
Pulmonary embolism detection: prospective evaluation of dual-section helical CT versus selective pulmonary arteriography in 157 patients. Qanadli SD, Hajjam ME, Mesurolle B et al, 2000, France 151 patients referred for radiological investigation of PE Diagnostic study Sensitivity 95%
Specificity 97%
Subsequent pulmonary embolism: risk after a negative helical CT pulmonary angiogram--prospective comparison with scintigraphy. Goodman LR, Lipchik RJ, Kuzo RS, et al. 2000, USA 198 patients with negative CTPAs Management study % diagnosed with DVT or PE in follow up period (minimum 3 months) 1% 34 died during follow up - only 12 post mortems42% of study population also had Dopplers
Study excluded any of these patients with a positive Doppler!
Unable to calculate numbers
Performance of helical computed tomography in unselected outpatients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Perrier A, Howarth N, Didier D, et al. 2001, Switzerland 287 emergency patients ?PE Diagnostic study Sensitivity 70%
Specificity 91.20%
The negative predictive value of spiral computed tomography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in patients with nondiagnostic ventilation-perfusion scans. Ost D, Rozenshtein A, Saffran L, et al. 2001, USA 71 patients with nondiagnostic VQ scans, normal Doppler scans and negative CTPAs Management study % diagnosed with DVT or PE in follow up period (minimum 3 months) 4.20% Patients had all had a negative Doppler scan
Diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicentre outcome study. Musset D, Parent F, Meyer G, et al. 2002, France 14 hospitals with 632 ?PE patients with negative CTPAs, 76.9% outpatients Management study % diagnosed with DVT or PE in follow up period (minimum 3 months) 10%
CT angiography of pulmonary embolism in patients with underlying respiratory disease: impact of multislice CT on image quality and negative predictive value. Remy-Jardin M, Tillie-Leblond I, Szapiro D, et al. 2002, France 259 patients with negative CTPA Management study % diagnosed with DVT or PE in follow up period (minimum 3 months) 4.20% 18% outpatientsFollow up period only looked for recurrent PE and not DVT
Risk of pulmonary embolism after a negative spiral CT angiogram in patients with pulmonary disease: 1-year clinical follow-up study. Tillie-Leblond I, Mastora I, Radenne F, et al. 2002, France 199 patients with normal CTPAs within one hospital over 3 year period
85.4% outpatients
Management study % diagnosed with DVT or PE in follow up period (minimum 3 months) 9.50% 73% had chronic respiratory disease
Single-detector helical computed tomography as the primary diagnostic test in suspected pulmonary embolism: a multicenter clinical management study of 510 patients. van Strijen MJ, de Monye W, Schiereck J, et al. 2003, Holland 378 ?PE patients with normal CTPAs in 3 hospitals Management study % diagnosed with DVT or PE in follow up period (minimum 3 months) 1%
Author Commentary:
The studies vary in quality and patient demographics. Only one study, Perrier et al (17) looked at unselected emergency department patients and is probably the most relevant study with a robust methodology. In the study by Qandil et al (13) 87% patients were outpatients making the study relevant and they used an excellent gold standard (pulmonary angiography). The management studies tended to exclude any patient diagnosed with a DVT immediately following negative CTPA – I have included these as false negative patients, wherever possible. This may overestimate prevalence of PE, however is generally accepted as a common reference standard for PE.
Almost all of these studies used single detector CT scanners. These are being replaced across the UK with multiscanners of superior quality.
No study looked at the diagnostic accuracy of the combination of CTPA and D-dimer.
Bottom Line:
CT pulmonary angiogram is not accurate enough to be used as a stand alone diagnostic tool for PE, but appears to perform well in combination with other tests such as Doppler or VQ scan.
References:
  1. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Wattinne L, et al.. Central pulmonary thromboembolism: diagnosis with spiral volumetric CT with the single-breath-hold technique--comparison with pulmonary angiography.
  2. Goodman LR, Curtin JJ, Mewissen MW, et al.. Detection of pulmonary embolism in patients with unresolved clinical and scintigraphic diagnosis: helical CT versus angiography.
  3. Teigen CL, Maus TP, Sheedy PF, et al.. Pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced electron-beam CT and comparison with pulmonary angiography
  4. van Rossum AB, Pattynama PM, Ton ER, et al.. Pulmonary embolism: validation of spiral CT angiography in 149 patients.
  5. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Deschildre F, et al.. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with spiral CT: comparison with pulmonary angiography and scintigraphy.
  6. Sostman HD, Layish DT, Tapson VF, et al.. Prospective comparison of helical CT and MR imaging in clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism.
  7. Ferretti GR, Bosson JL, Buffaz PD, et al.. Acute pulmonary embolism: role of helical CT in 164 patients with intermediate probability at ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy and normal results at duplex US of the legs.
  8. Boonbaichaiyapruck S, Panpunnang S, Siripornpitak S. Utilization of electron beam CT scan in diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.
  9. Mayo JR, Remy-Jardin M, Muller NL, et al.. Pulmonary embolism: prospective comparison of spiral CT with ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy.
  10. Drucker EA, Rivitz SM, Shepard JA et al.. Acute pulmonary embolism: assessment of helical CT for diagnosis.
  11. Garg K, Welsh CH, Feyerabend AJ, et al.. Pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with spiral CT and ventilation-perfusion scanning--correlation with pulmonary angiographic results or clinical outcome.
  12. Kim KI, Muller NL, Mayo JR.. Clinically suspected pulmonary embolism: utility of spiral CT.
  13. Blachere H, Latrabe V, Montaudon M, et al.. Pulmonary embolism revealed on helical CT angiography: comparison with ventilation-perfusion radionuclide lung scanning.
  14. Qanadli SD, Hajjam ME, Mesurolle B et al,. Pulmonary embolism detection: prospective evaluation of dual-section helical CT versus selective pulmonary arteriography in 157 patients.
  15. Goodman LR, Lipchik RJ, Kuzo RS, et al.. Subsequent pulmonary embolism: risk after a negative helical CT pulmonary angiogram--prospective comparison with scintigraphy.
  16. Perrier A, Howarth N, Didier D, et al.. Performance of helical computed tomography in unselected outpatients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
  17. Ost D, Rozenshtein A, Saffran L, et al.. The negative predictive value of spiral computed tomography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in patients with nondiagnostic ventilation-perfusion scans.
  18. Musset D, Parent F, Meyer G, et al.. Diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicentre outcome study.
  19. Remy-Jardin M, Tillie-Leblond I, Szapiro D, et al.. CT angiography of pulmonary embolism in patients with underlying respiratory disease: impact of multislice CT on image quality and negative predictive value.
  20. Tillie-Leblond I, Mastora I, Radenne F, et al.. Risk of pulmonary embolism after a negative spiral CT angiogram in patients with pulmonary disease: 1-year clinical follow-up study.
  21. van Strijen MJ, de Monye W, Schiereck J, et al.. Single-detector helical computed tomography as the primary diagnostic test in suspected pulmonary embolism: a multicenter clinical management study of 510 patients.