Bone scintigraphy (BS) in diagnosing scaphoid fractures with normal X-ray results

Date First Published:
July 16, 2010
Last Updated:
July 16, 2010
Report by:
Zinnirah Zainodin, Medical student (University of Manchester)
Three-Part Question:
In [adult patients with a suspected scaphoid fracture], is [bone scintigraphy (BS)] reliable to [diagnose a fracture in an initially negative X-ray result]?
Clinical Scenario:
A 25-year-old right-handed carpenter came to the Emergency Department (ED) with a recent history of a fall onto his outstretched hand. He complained of pain in the wrist and some tenderness was reported in the anatomical snuffbox. The subsequent X-ray showed no abnormality. Should the patient undergo another investigation, such as an MRI, there and then?
Search Strategy:
Ovid MEDLINE(R) 1950 to June Week 4 2010
Search Details:
[exp Scaphoid Bone OR exp Carpal Bones OR scaphoid$.mp. OR exp Fractures, Bone OR fracture$.mp]
Limit to English language AND humans AND all adult (19 plus years).
AND
[exp Radionuclide Imaging OR bone scintigraphy$.mp. OR bone scan$.mp.]
Outcome:
66 papers were identified in Medline, only five papers were identified relevant to the three-part question.
Relevant Paper(s):
Study Title Patient Group Study type (level of evidence) Outcomes Key results Study Weaknesses
Bone scintigraphy in the management of X-ray-negative potential scaphoid fractures. Wilson AW, Kurer MHJ, Peggington JL, Grant DS and Kirk CCJ. 1986 England 111 patients (73 male, 38 women), mean age: 36 years old
Presented to ED with suspected scaphoid fracture but negative initial x-ray
Diagnostic study,
Diagnostic cohort study
Fractures seen on BS 29-scaphoid fracture, 13-distal radius, 38-other carpal bones, 15-phalanges, 11-increased generalised uptake, 5-normal Publication bias not mentioned.

Statistical analysis of the result was not discussed.

Sensitivity or specificity was not included.
The utility of a bone scan in a diagnosis of clinical scaphoid fracture. Murphy D, Eisenhauer M 1994 Canada 54 patients (39 males, 15 females), mean age: 32.3 years old
Presented to ED with suspected scaphoid fracture but negative initial x-ray
Retrospective study,
Diagnostic cohort study
Scaphoid fracture on radiography 10-14 days post-injury 2-fractures on radiography, 37-negative radiography and no anatomical snuffbox tenderness – discharged, 15-negative x-ray but positive clinical exam – undergo BS Statistical analysis was not included.

Small samples size.

Publication bias not mentioned.

Sensitivity or specificity was not included
BS findings 7-negative BS 8-positive BS (6-scaphoid fracture, 2-other fracture)
Fifteen minutes bone scintigraphy in patients with clinically suspected scaphoid fracture and normal x-rays. Bayer LR, Widding A, Diemer H 2000 Denmark 40 patients (14 males, 26 females), mean age: 32
Presented to ED with suspected scaphoid fracture but negative initial x-ray
Retrospective study,

Diagnostic cohort study
Fractures seen on BS 8-scaphoid fractures, 5-distal radius, 8-other carpal bones fracture, 5-diffuse uptake, 17-normal Statistical analysis was not included.

Small samples size.

Publication bias not mentioned.

Sensitivity or specificity was not included.
Outcome of routine bone scintigraphy in suspected scaphoid fractures Beeres FJP, Hogervorst M, den Hollander P, Rhemrev S 2005 The Netherlands 56 patients (36 male, 20 female)
Mean age: 38 years old
Presented to ED with suspected scaphoid fracture but negative initial x-ray
Retrospective study,
Diagnostic cohort study
Fractures seen on BS images 15-Scaphoid fracture, 11-distal radius fracture, 9-other carpal fracture, 3-metacarpal fracture, 7-wrist contusion, 11-normal Small samples size.

Publication bias not mentioned.

Statistical analysis of the result was not discussed.

Sensitivity or specificity was not included.
A prospective comparison for suspected scaphoid fractures: Bone scintigraphy versus clinical Outcome Beeres FJP, Hogervorst M, Rhemrev SJ, den Hollander P, Jukema GN. 2007 The Netherlands 50 patients (29 male, 21 female)
Mean age: 42 years old.
Presented to ED with suspected scaphoid fracture but negative initial x-ray
Prospective study,
Blinded,

Diagnostic cohort study
Fractures seen on BS images 14-scaphoid fracture, 2-Scaphoid and distal radius, 20-Other fractures, 14-Normal Small samples size.

Publication bias not mentioned.

Statistical analysis of the result was not discussed.

Another outcome i.e. physical examination findings was not clearly stated.
BS Sensitivity: 92% Specificity: 87%
Author Commentary:
BS has shown evidence of significant reliability for detecting scaphoid fractures in negative initial X-ray findings. BS works principally by detecting the focal uptake of the radionuclide by the osteoblast activity, which is optimum at 3-5 days post-injury, therefore during this period BS imaging will be most sensitive. Increased focal activity may be because of fracture, neoplasm or other soft tissue injuries; therefore careful interpretation and review need to be taken into account
Bottom Line:
BS may be used as a second-line investigation after 3-5 days post-injury in patients with wrist trauma but a negative initial X-ray investigation. However, safety and cost-effectiveness have not been established and more studies are needed to answer these questions.
References:
  1. Wilson AW, Kurer MHJ, Peggington JL, Grant DS and Kirk CCJ.. Bone scintigraphy in the management of X-ray-negative potential scaphoid fractures.
  2. Murphy D, Eisenhauer M. The utility of a bone scan in a diagnosis of clinical scaphoid fracture.
  3. Bayer LR, Widding A, Diemer H. Fifteen minutes bone scintigraphy in patients with clinically suspected scaphoid fracture and normal x-rays.
  4. Beeres FJP, Hogervorst M, den Hollander P, Rhemrev S. Outcome of routine bone scintigraphy in suspected scaphoid fractures
  5. Beeres FJP, Hogervorst M, Rhemrev SJ, den Hollander P, Jukema GN.. A prospective comparison for suspected scaphoid fractures: Bone scintigraphy versus clinical Outcome