ED boozing statistics

Date First Published:
September 22, 2006
Last Updated:
July 20, 2007
Report by:
Maria Ahmed, MPH student (Manchester University)
Search checked by:
Kevin Mackway-Jones, Manchester University
Three-Part Question:
In [UK emergency departments] is the [prevalence of alcohol-related presentations] [sufficiently high to jusitfy implementation of brief intervention]?
Clinical Scenario:
Another day as hotshot Clinical Director, another day of corporate meetings and complex decision-making: Is alcohol a significant contributor to ED presentations? Would I be able to justify the implementation of an Alcohol Health Service within the department? Is this really as big a priority as the Government makes out?

Luckily, you have your resident Professor to hand, a man of many talents - he is able to conduct robust literature searches at the touch of a button. You decide to find out the prevalence of alcohol misuse across UK EDs as a first step in deciding whether to jump on the 'Preventive Emergency Medicine' band-wagon and offer brief intervention to eligible patients
Search Strategy:
MEDLINE 1996 to July week 1 2007
EMBASE 1980 to 2007 week 28
PsycINFO 1985 to July week 2 2007
CINAHL 1982 to July week 1 2007
Search Details:
MEDLINE:
{[(alcohol$.mp. OR ethanol.mp. OR exp Ethanol/ OR booze$.mp. OR exp Alcohol Drinking/) AND (addict$.mp. OR hazard$.mp. OR problem$.mp. OR binge$.mp. OR abuse$.mp. OR misuse$.mp OR dependence.mp.)] OR [alcoholism.mp. OR exp Alcoholism/ OR exp Alcoholic Intoxication/]}
AND [exp Emergency Service, Hospital/ OR emergency department$.mp. OR (accident and emergency).mp. OR exp Trauma Centers/]
AND [prevalence.mp. OR exp Prevalence/ OR exp Cross-Sectional Studies/ OR cross sectional.mp. OR survey.mp. OR exp Data Collection/ OR exp Medical Audit/ OR audit$.mp. OR incidence.mp. OR exp Incidence/]
AND [united kingdom.mp. OR exp Great Britain/ OR uk.mp.]

EMBASE:
{[(alcohol$.mp. OR exp ALCOHOL/ OR ethanol.mp. OR booze$.mp. OR exp Alcohol Consumption/) AND (addict$.mp. OR hazard$.mp. OR problem$.mp. OR binge$.mp. OR abuse$.mp. OR misuse$.mp OR dependence.mp.)] OR [alcoholism.mp. OR exp ALCOHOLISM/ OR exp Drug Dependence/ OR exp Drug Misuse/ OR exp Alcohol Abuse/ OR exp ALCOHOL INTOXICATION/]}
AND [exp Emergency Medicine/ OR exp Emergency Health Service/ OR emergency department$.mp. OR exp emergency ward/ OR (accident and emergency).mp. OR trauma center.mp.]
AND [prevalence.mp. OR exp PREVALENCE/ OR cross sectional.mp. OR survey.mp. OR exp HEALTH SURVEY/ OR data collection OR audit.mp. OR exp Medical Audit/ OR incidence.mp. OR exp INCIDENCE/]
AND [united kingdom.mp. OR exp United Kingdom/ OR great britain.mp. OR uk.mp.]

PsycINFO:
{[(alcohol$.mp. OR ethanol.mp. OR exp ETHANOL/ OR booze$.mp.) AND (addict$.mp. OR hazard$.mp. OR problem$.mp. OR binge$.mp. OR abuse$.mp. OR misuse$.mp)] OR [alcoholism.mp. OR exp ALCOHOLISM/ OR exp Alcohol Drinking Patterns/ OR exp Drug Dependency/ OR exp ALCOHOL ABUSE/ OR exp Alcohol Intoxication/]}
AND [exp Emergency Services/ OR emergency department$.mp. OR (accident and emergency).mp. OR trauma center$]
AND [prevalence.mp. OR exp Prevalence/ OR exp Cross-Sectional Studies/ OR cross sectional.mp. OR survey.mp. OR exp Data Collection/ OR exp Medical Audit/ OR audit$.mp. OR incidence.mp. OR exp Incidence/]
AND [united kingdom.mp. OR exp Great Britain/ OR uk.mp.]

CINAHL:
{[(alcohol$.mp. OR ethanol.mp. OR exp Alcohol, Ethyl/ OR booze$.mp. OR exp Alcohol Drinking/) AND (addict$.mp. OR hazard$.mp. OR problem$.mp. OR binge$.mp. OR abuse$.mp. OR misuse$.mp OR dependence.mp.)] OR [alcoholism.mp. OR exp ALCOHOLISM/ OR exp Alcohol abuse/ OR exp Alcoholic Intoxication/]}
AND [exp Emergency Service/ OR emergency department$.mp. OR (accident and emergency).mp. OR exp Trauma Centers/]
AND [prevalence.mp. OR exp PREVALENCE/ OR exp Cross Sectional Studies/ OR cross sectional.mp. OR survey.mp. OR exp Surveys/ OR exp Data Collection/ OR exp Audit/ OR audit$.mp. OR incidence.mp. OR exp INCIDENCE/]
AND [united kingdom.mp. OR exp United Kingdom/ OR exp Great Britain/ OR uk.mp.]
Outcome:
76 papers found of which 6 were relevant and of sufficient quality for inclusion
Relevant Paper(s):
Study Title Patient Group Study type (level of evidence) Outcomes Key results Study Weaknesses
Saliva alcohol concentrations in accident and emergency attendances Simpson T, Murphy N, Peck DF 2001 Scotland 544 of 638 eligible patients aged >/= years; new patients attending ED; consent/ parental consent; not direct medical referrals via ED; not GP (General Practitioner) referrals for radiological examination; not uninvited returns; not critically injured or unable to give informed consent
Sampling period: 2 months mid-February to mid-April 24-hours a day*
Prospective survey Saliva alcohol concentrations measured using either QED A-150 or QED A-350 enzymatic test device (Enzymatics Incorporated) via noting colour change on scale Positive alcohol concentrations in 122 patients (22%, 95% CI 19 to 26%). 64% male, 6% aged 10-17 years *90 'lost' to study as not possible to approach patients at times of high clinical activity; inter-observer differences in test reporting not examined; baseline data collected by self-report; no check for concordance against objective medical records; saliva test does not capture those presenting late after an alcohol-related event i.e. underestimates total amount consumed
Toxicological screening in trauma Carrigan TD, Field H, Illingworth RN et al 2000 England 93 of 116 eligible patients >12 years; assessed and treated for trauma related injuries in ED resuscitation room; consenting; not tertiary referrals from outside hospital catchment area
Sampling period: 6 months 01/07/97 to 31/12/97
24-hours a day
Prospective prevalence study Blood ethanol concentration >80mg/dl using enzymatic assay (Sigma Chemical Company) 89 samples taken: 24 patients (27%, 95% CI 18 to 36%) had plasma ethanol concentrations >80mg/dl Small sample size, wide confidence intervals; insufficient numbers in adolescent group to enable analysis by age-band; study restricted to major trauma patients; reasons for non-enrolment not stated
Comparing two different methods of identifying alcohol related problems in the emergency department: a real chance to intervene? Hadida A, Kapur N, Mackway-Jones K et al 2001 England 413 of 429 ED patients aged >/= 12 years; consenting; well enough to interview
Sampling period: 6 weeks; every 5th consecutive patient presenting during each of 6 time periods (8am-12pm, 12pm - 4pm, 4pm-8pm, 8pm-12am, 12am-4am and 4am-8am)
Representative flow sample survey Alcohol-related attendance using CAGE questionnaire (¡Ý2 items endorsed), staff and patient assessments 115 (28%) alcohol-related attendances on basis of CAGE or staff assessment; 8.7% by CAGE and staff assessment; 9.4% by CAGE only and 9.7% by staff assessment only 'Alcohol-related' undefined; patient and staff assessments not validated; 'alcohol-related' and 'problem-drinker' used interchangeably; small sample size
Comparison of CAGE-identified and staff-identified alcohol-related attendees by patient demographic and presentation data CAGE-identified group more likely to be male (p<0.01), more likely to present during normal working hours (p=0.06) and more likely to acknowledge attendance as alcohol-related (p<0.01). No difference in age, alcohol consumption or day of presentation between two groups.
The burden of alcohol misuse on an inner-city general hospital. Pirmohamed M, Brown C, Owens L et al 2000 England All 15 931 ED patients
Sampling period: 2 months 07/08/96 to 07/10/96
Prospective survey Alcohol-related attendance using staff assessment via coloured sticker pre-affixed to case-card 1915 (12%) patients had alcohol-related attendances. Median age 36 years; range 11-90 years; 73% males 'Alcohol-related' not defined; 20% stickers not completed by staff; no validated screening tool used
Identifying alcohol-related harm in young drinkers: the role of accident and emergency departments. Thom B, Herring R, Judd A 1999 England 679 ED ambulant patients aged >/= 16 years across two EDs (Central and Suburban); consenting
Sampling period: one week 8am-12am Sunday to Thursday and 8am-3am Friday and Saturday. Central: 03/96 7 days spread throughout month; Suburban: 05/96 7 consecutive days
Screening study Self-report alcohol-related attendance 16-24 group significantly more likely to report alcohol-related attendance than ¡Ý25 group (15% versus 7%, p=0.004) Total number of eligible patients not stated; varying sampling strategies across two EDs; small sample size of 16-24 year olds; no staff assessment; questionable validity of adolescent self-report
Self-report alcohol consumption 6 hours prior to attendance 17% 16-24 year olds reported drinking 6h prior to attendance versus 13% in ¡Ý25 group (not significant)
Alcohol consumption using Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test - AUDIT questionnaire (¡Ý8 detects those experiencing current alcohol problems and those at risk of future harm) 16-24 group significantly more likely to score ¡Ý8 on AUDIT than ¡Ý25 group (37% versus 23%, p<0.001)
Children and the ingestion of alcohol: a statistical analysis of children attending an A & E department Connor J 1997 England Children (aged between 1-16 years) attending the Royal Liverpool Children's Hospital
Sampling period: 12 months 01/02/96 to 31/01/97
Record review Number of patients attending ED following ingestion of alcohol 169 (0.3%) of 61,452 new ED attendances. 75 (44%) male; age range 9-16, mode 14 years Inclusion criteria and method of data extraction inadequately described
Author Commentary:
As expected, each study produced different estimates of alcohol-related presentations - the differences being mostly attributable to the type of ED population examined and the methodology used
Bottom Line:
Alcohol is a significant contributor to ED presentations. Given growing evidence for the cost-effectiveness of routine identification and intervention for alcohol misuse in EDs, implementation of such a service would be justified
References:
  1. Simpson T, Murphy N, Peck DF. Saliva alcohol concentrations in accident and emergency attendances
  2. Carrigan TD, Field H, Illingworth RN et al. Toxicological screening in trauma
  3. Hadida A, Kapur N, Mackway-Jones K et al. Comparing two different methods of identifying alcohol related problems in the emergency department: a real chance to intervene?
  4. Pirmohamed M, Brown C, Owens L et al. The burden of alcohol misuse on an inner-city general hospital.
  5. Thom B, Herring R, Judd A. Identifying alcohol-related harm in young drinkers: the role of accident and emergency departments.
  6. Connor J. Children and the ingestion of alcohol: a statistical analysis of children attending an A & E department