Little evidence for conservative or operative management of undisplaced Bennett’s fractures

Date First Published:
March 1, 2000
Last Updated:
May 24, 2001
Report by:
Bruce Martin, Clinical Fellow (Manchester Royal Infirmary)
Search checked by:
Martin Smith, Manchester Royal Infirmary
Three-Part Question:
In [an adult patient with an undisplaced Bennetts' fracture] is [conservative management better than surgical management] at [minimising time to recovery and final disability]?
Clinical Scenario:
A 32 year old man presents to the Emergency Department following a fight. He complains of pain around the base of the right thumb metacarpal. X-ray reveals an undisplaced Bennetts' fracture. You wonder whether he should be treated conservatively or surgically.
Search Strategy:
Medline 1966-10/99 using the OVID interface.
Search Details:
[{exp fractures OR exp fractures, closed OR fracture$.mp} AND [({exp thumb OR thumb.mp OR first.mp} AND {exp metacarpus OR metacarp$.mp}) OR Bennett$] AND {exp emergency treatment OR exp treatment outcome OR treatment$.mp OR treat$.mp}] LIMIT to human AND english.
Outcome:
98 papers found of which 92 irrelevant or of insufficient quality for inclusion. The remaining six papers are shown in the table.
Relevant Paper(s):
Study Title Patient Group Study type (level of evidence) Outcomes Key results Study Weaknesses
Fractures of the base of the first metacarpal bone: results of surgical treatment. van Niekerk JL and Ouwens R. 1989, Netherlands 12 of 23 patients with fractures at the base of the thumb metacarpal treated surgically Retrospective survey Limitation of activities of daily living No limitations Small numbers Uncontrolled
Bennett's fracture. Kjaer-Petersen K, Langhoff O, Andersen K. 1990, Denmark 41 patients with Bennett's fracture treated variously (9 closed reduction, 6 percutaneous K wires, 26 open reduction).
Followed up at a median of 7.3 years.
Retrospective survey Residual symptoms No symptoms in 15 of 18 with good reductions compared with 6 of 13 with residual displacement.
The conservative management of Bennett's fracture-dislocation: a 26-year follow-up. Livesley PJ. 1990, UK 17 patients with Bennett's fracture treated conservatively
Followed up at a mean of 26 years.
Retrospective survey Residual symptoms 7 of 17 Small numbers
Uncontrolled
Range of movement and grip strength Reduced in all patients
Bennett's fracture: a medium to long-term review. Aust New Zealand Thurston AJ and Dempsey SM. 1993, New Zealand 21 of 76 patients with Bennett's fracture
Followed up at a mean of 7 years 7 months
Retropective survey Residual symptoms Less if residual fracture displacement less than 1mm. Method of reduction immaterial Small numbers
long-term evaluation of Bennett's fracture. A comparison between open and closed reduction. Timmenga EJ, Blokhuis TJ, Maas M et al. 1994, Netherlands 18 patients with Bennett's fracture. Closed reduction with K wire fixation (7) vs open reduction and bone graft (11)
Followed up at a mean of 10.7 years
Retropective survey Thumb mobility Full in all cases Small numbers
Grip strength Reduced in all cases
Osteoarthritis Degree correlated with the residual displacement
Nonoperative treatment of Bennett's fracture: a 13 year follow-up. Oosterbos CJ and de Boer HH. 1995, Netherlands 20 of 22 patients with Bennett's fracture treated by closed reduction and plaster immobilisation. Retrospective survey Subjective outcome Satisfactory in 18 of 20 Small numbers
Uncontrolled
Development of arthrosis 7 of 20. in 6 of these original reduction had been nonanatomic
Author Commentary:
The evidence in this area is extremely poor. All studies are small and retrospective. A well designed PRCT is needed.
Bottom Line:
Good initial reduction probably reduces the incidence of later arthrosis of the base of the thumb metacarpal. There is no evidence to help decide whether a conservative or a surgical approach is preferable.
References:
  1. van Niekerk JL and Ouwens R.. Fractures of the base of the first metacarpal bone: results of surgical treatment.
  2. Kjaer-Petersen K, Langhoff O, Andersen K.. Bennett's fracture.
  3. Livesley PJ.. The conservative management of Bennett's fracture-dislocation: a 26-year follow-up.
  4. Thurston AJ and Dempsey SM.. Bennett's fracture: a medium to long-term review. Aust New Zealand
  5. Timmenga EJ, Blokhuis TJ, Maas M et al.. long-term evaluation of Bennett's fracture. A comparison between open and closed reduction.
  6. Oosterbos CJ and de Boer HH.. Nonoperative treatment of Bennett's fracture: a 13 year follow-up.