The use of intrapleural anaesthetic to reduce the pain of chest drain insertion

Date First Published:
September 7, 2006
Last Updated:
May 16, 2007
Report by:
Gabby May, Senior Clinical Felllow in Emergency Medicine (Manchester Royal Infirmary)
Search checked by:
Tom Bartrum, Manchester Royal Infirmary
Three-Part Question:
[After insertion of a chest drain] does [the use of local anaesthetic down the drain] reduce [patient's pain]?
Clinical Scenario:
A 25 year old chap with a history of spontaneous pneumothorax presents to the ED with a further large pneumothorax. Unfortunately, attempted aspiration fails due to a permanent leak, and he requires an intercostal drain. He has had a chest drain inserted in the past and admits that it was very painful whilst the drain was in situ. You wonder whether administration of local anaesthetic down the tube would provide good analgesia, and decrease the need for oral/iv meds.
Search Strategy:
MEDLINE OVID INTERFACE 1966 - Aug 2006
Search Details:
exp anesthetics, local/ OR local anaesth$.mp. OR exp lignocaine/ OR bupivicaine.mp. OR marcain.mp. OR lignocaine.mp. OR lidocaine.mp. OR exp lidocaine/ OR (local adj5 anaesthetic).mp. AND chest drain.mp. OR intercostal drain.mp. OR chest tube.mp. OR exp chest tubes/ OR exp drainage/ OR exp thoracostomy/ limit to english and humans
Outcome:
190 articles found, 2 relevant
Relevant Paper(s):
Study Title Patient Group Study type (level of evidence) Outcomes Key results Study Weaknesses
Interpleural bupivicaine for analgesia during chest drainage treatment for pneumothorax. A randomised double blind study. Engdahl et al Feb-93 Sweden 22 patients with indwelling chest drains - 8 hourly boluses of 20ml interpleural bupivicaine with 0.5% adrenaline, compared with placebo - visual analogue scale scores compared Randomised double blind trial VAS scores after 1st injection (exclude pt 2) lower in bupivicaine group at 5,15, 30 and 60 mins p<0.01 small study
8 hours between boluses though bupivivaine is relatively short acting
timing of 1st intrapleural injection not standardised - "at 4hrs or earlier if in severe pain"
VAS score 4 hrs post 1st injection no difference between groups
VAS scores after injections 2-10 only significant difeerence in favour of bupivicaine at 5 mins post 2nd injuection, and post 7th injection, otherwise pain VAS comparable
Use of IV morphine not significant, though tended to be asked for earlor in control group
Use of oral analgesia no difference in consumption
Author Commentary:
Patients with indwelling chest drains may have severe pain and require oral or intravenous analgesia including opiates. There has been much research on the use of intrapleural analgesia after chest trauma and thoracostomy, but only one study which looks at the use of intrapleural analgesia solely for the relief of pain from the indwelling drain.

Although the number of patients is small, it seems to suggest that there may be a role for intrapleural analgesia in this subset of patients. No side effects of treament were noted.

The biggest benefit of intrapleural bupivicaine seems to be gained with its early introduction, and also if it is given regularly, at least every 4 h, due to its short half life. Oral analgesia should still be given to these patients.

Better pain relief in this group of patients would also be beneficial, as it would improve the patients's ablility to cough and deep breathe, and thus reduce the number of secondary chest infections.
Bottom Line:
Intrapleural bupivicaine should be considered in patients who have chest drains inserted, in addition to regular oral/parenteral analgesia.
References:
  1. Engdahl et al. Interpleural bupivicaine for analgesia during chest drainage treatment for pneumothorax. A randomised double blind study.