The use of vasopressin and epinephrine for patients in cardiac arrest due to local anaesthetic toxicity.

Date First Published:
July 13, 2010
Last Updated:
July 14, 2010
Report by:
Daniel Ferris, Medical Student (University of Manchester)
Search checked by:
Daniel Ferris, University of Manchester
Three-Part Question:
In [adults with local anaesthetic toxicity in cardiac arrest] is [vasopressin better than epinephrine] at [reducing morbidity and mortality]?
Clinical Scenario:
Clinical Scenario A thirty-three year old male is goes into cardiac arrest after an accidental overdoes of tetracaine. Which drug would be most effective in the resuscitation of this patient?
Search Strategy:
Using Ovid interface; Medline 1950 to June week 4 2010, Embase 1980 to 2010 week 26, Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2005 May 2010
Search Details:
[exp Anesthesia, Local/ OR (local adj1 anaesthe$).mp OR exp Anesthetics, Local/ OR exp bupivacaine/ OR bupivacaine$.mp. OR lidocaine/ OR lidocaine$.mp. OR exp prilocaine/ OR prilocaine$.mp. OR exp lignocaine/ OR lignocaine$.mp. OR marcaine$.mp.] AND [exp heart arrest/] AND [exp vasopressins/ OR exp epinephrine/] LIMIT to English language and humans.
Outcome:
570 papers 0 of which were relevant
Author Commentary:
No papers were found that compared vasopressin and epinephrine. There were case reports where epinephrine had been used for resuscitation in cardiac arrest due to local anaesthetic toxicity; as these did not compare vasopressin they are not relevant to the clinical question. There is no evidence for the use of vasopressin over epinephrine.
Bottom Line:
No evidence vasopressin is superior to epinephrine in those patients in cardiac arrest due to local anaesthetic toxicity. Continue standard cardiac arrest protocol.